Skip to content

The American Malefactor’s Dictionary: blackleg

Go to The American Malefactor's Dictionary

Sunday Cockfighting New Orleans - 1871

blackleg

– 1. a gambler; 2. someone who bets without intending to pay his losses; 3. a swindler, a criminal.

The term derives from criminals and swindlers who had black bruises on their legs from sitting in the stocks or from wearing fetters. Another possible origin comes from the black color on the legs of gamecocks, since gamblers and swindlers frequently attended cockfights.

Sources

  • Barrère, Albert and Charles G. Leland. A Dictionary of Slang, Jargon, and Cant. [London]: The Ballantyne Press, 1889.
  • London Antiquary, A [Hotten, John Camden]. A Dictionary of Modern Slang, Cant, and Vulgar Words. 2nd ed. London: John Camden Hotten, 1860.
  • Matsell, George W. Vocabulum: Or, the Rogue’s Lexicon.. New York: George W. Matsell, 1859.

Note: See “Cant: The Language of the Underworld” to learn more about the background of the American Malefactor’s Dictionary.

The American Malefactor’s Dictionary: black ointment

Go to The American Malefactor's Dictionary

A raw steak
Image via Wikipedia

black ointment

– pieces of raw meat (“It soothes dogs and men.”).

Sources

  • Barrère, Albert and Charles G. Leland. A Dictionary of Slang, Jargon, and Cant. [London]: The Ballantyne Press, 1889.
  • Farmer, John S. and W. E. Henley. A Dictionary of Slang and Colloquial English. Abridged from Slang and Its Analogues. London: George Routledge and Sons, 1912.
  • Matsell, George W. Vocabulum: Or, the Rogue’s Lexicon.. New York: George W. Matsell, 1859.
  • Partridge, Eric. A Dictionary of the Underworld. New York: Bonanza Books, 1961.

Note: See “Cant: The Language of the Underworld” to learn more about the background of the American Malefactor’s Dictionary.

Early American Crimes: Burglary Wrap-Up

[display_podcast]

Go to Early American Crimes

Click the image to go to Early American Crimes

Over the past year or so I have been writing about burglars and burglary in early America. To conclude this informal series I am going to try something a little different.

Please click on the audio media file attached to this post to hear me talk about my reflections and conclusions about burglary in early America. I am including my notes below to help you follow along as I talk.

The Burglars

  • Backgrounds
    • Some had neglectful parents, and some even learned their criminal skills from their parents or guardians.
    • Others came from well-off families and had kind, generous, and God-fearing parents.
    • Some were educated, but others received little to no education at all.
    • Some of the burglars served in the army, where they picked up skills and behaviors that led them into a life of crime.
  • A movement from isolated incidents of burglary–perhaps carried out during irrational moments–to more calculated, organized, and professional acts of burglary.
    • The Harvard-educated burglars, James Ward and Joseph Welde (1644): a couple of college kids who made poor judgment in burglarizing the house of one of their uncles.
    • Mathew Cushing (1734): his crimes appear to be less the acts of a professional criminal than of a rebellious young man who tried to take advantage of opportunities as they presented themselves to him.
    • The Morrison Gang (1744): an organized, professional gang of criminals living in Philadelphia, who carried out a string of calculated burglaries.
    • Henry Tufts (1793): planted burglary tools around the area he targeted, so that he had immediate access to them.
  • Personal progression.
    • Burglars often started out committing acts of petty crime as youths and then became more daring and attempted more sophisticated crimes as they got older.
    • Many of the burglars talked about a specific moment when they decided to become a professional criminal, almost like a conversion.

Burglary Methods

  • Many of the burglars took advantage of opportunities as they saw them, such as an open window.
  • More professional burglars employed advanced planning to carry out their burglaries and usually gained knowledge of the shop or building they were about to burglarize from a friend or acquaintance.
  • Some burglars returned over and over again to the same towns and stores.
  • Of all the burglars profiled, not one of them employed violence in carrying out a burglary.

Punishments

  • Burglary had to be punished harshly, because it was easy to carry out at this time.
    • Easy to break into houses and stores.
    • Dwellings were more isolated from one another, which made for easy targets.
    • Problem of the Bible never singling out burglary as a crime, so early American communities that based their social organization on the Word of God did not have guidance in punishing burglary.
  • Trends:
    • The Harvard-educated burglars, James Ward and Joseph Welde (1644): a whipping and expulsion from school.
    • Arthur Nottool (1664): successfully pleaded Benefit of Clergy after being found guilty of burglary in Maryland, thus avoiding a death sentence.
    • Mathew Cushing (1734): who was executed and was the first American criminal celebrity.
    • Henry Tufts (1793): despite committing multiple burglaries, which should have earned him a death sentence, Tufts received a reprieve from the governor and was instead committed to life in prison.
  • Branding as a punishment seemed to go away in the 1770’s, and it never seemed to stop the criminal from committing further acts of burglary, as in the case of Isaac Frasier.
  • Escapes from jail and prison:
    • The fluid walls of the jails: most of the burglars held in prison seemed to be able to find their way out, and often did.
    • Makes sense: experts at breaking into houses and stores can use those same skills to break out of prison.
    • Burglars were adroit at identifying weaknesses in building construction and could use the vulnerabilities of prison walls to escape.
    • Their escapes indicate how primitive some of these prisons must have been, since their inhabitants could so easily escape out of them.
  • As in England, there was a struggle over the bodies of the executed to keep them away from surgeons, who wanted to use them for dissection.
    • Mathew Cushing was dissected.
    • Levi Ames’s body was successfully buried in an undisclosed location, despite the surgeons’s determination to take possession of it.
  • Many of the burglars asked people to use their fate as a warning not to follow in their footsteps.

In the end, I never grew tired of these stories of burglars. I originally thought that by focusing on burglary, at some point I would find myself repeating the same story over and over again. But that never happened.

As I read about and explored these criminal figures, each burglar exhibited some twist in their behavior or circumstance or criminal act that called out and compelled me to write about him or her. I hope these stories of early American burglars have captured your imagination as much as they have mine.

Early American Criminals: Henry Tufts in the Castle

[display_podcast]

Go to Early American Criminals

Note: This post follows “Henry Tufts’s Partners in Crime.”

While living in Massachusetts in 1793, Henry Tufts purchased a silver tablespoon and five teaspoons from John Stewart, who said he found them while clearing out a cellar. Tufts used the spoons until a neighbor recognized them as stolen and reported Tufts to the authorities.

When Tufts told the court how he had acquired the spoons, Stewart was brought in for questioning as well. But before Stewart could fully disclose how he had acquired the spoons, he ran out of the courtroom and escaped, possibly with the assistance of the sheriff, who apparently had it out for Tufts. Now that Tufts lacked a witness to back up his story, he was committed to the Salem jail to await trial by the Supreme Court.

Tufts’s trial did not go well. The loss of Stewart as a witness hampered the spirited defense put up by Tufts’s lawyers, and the jury found Tufts guilty of burglary, although one skeptical juror forced the jury to take several votes before joining the others. Judge Paine condemned Tufts to death by proclaiming that he “must be carried from thence to the place of execution, and there hanged by the neck until dead.” Paine set the day of execution for Thursday, August 14, 1793, which gave Tufts six weeks to prepare for his final exit.

Death Row

While Tufts sat in prison in heavy chains to prevent his escape, the lone holdout juror began to have second thoughts about how he went along with the other jurors and switched his vote from not guilty to guilty. He went before the Governor and Council to express his regret and asked them to show Tufts mercy. In the meantime, Tufts petitioned the Governor to ask for a pardon in exchange for a lifetime prison sentence and urged other influential people to speak with the Governor on his behalf. But Tufts’s efforts did not produce any results.

With less than two weeks to go before his execution, Tufts was visited by a physician, “who accosted me with an affability and good nature, not always to be expected from a stranger.” After sweet-talking Tufts for some time, the doctor finally got to the point of his visit: he was interested in Tufts’s skeleton and offered Tufts a couple guineas and other favors in exchange for his dead body. The proposal horrified Tufts, who sent the doctor away.

Yet another gentleman visited Tufts and offered him seventy dollars for a license to publish Tufts’s life story. Tufts told the man that he was not in any condition to provide a full account of his life, but the man assured him that he knew enough about Tufts to piece together a fine narrative. Since Tufts had no use for money, he told the man that he would consider the offer and get back to him. After consulting with another friend, Tufts turned down the proposal and kept ownership over his life’s story just in case he was able to earn a reprieve.

On the morning of his scheduled execution, Tufts felt chills run down his spine when he looked out the window and saw the sexton carrying tools to dig a grave beneath the gallows where Tufts was to be executed. A schoolmistress visited Tufts and added to his “unutterable consternation” when she told him that she had just seen the coffin that was to hold his dead body. Tufts then heard the gathering of a large numbers of spectators for his execution, and the sound of every footstep outside his jail cell made him shudder with the expectation that it could be the angel of death.

But by three o’clock in the afternoon, the warrant for Tufts’s execution had yet to arrive. The deputy sheriffs continued to wait with Tufts until four o’clock, when it became clear that the warrant would not appear that day. The execution was postponed indefinitely, and the crowd of three thousand dispersed. Every night, Tufts went to bed wondering what was to become of him. He remained in this liminal state for a month, until an order finally arrived to transfer him to the Castle in the Boston Harbor where he was to be confined for life.

Great Theater

The episode of Tufts being falsely accused of stealing a set of spoons and his subsequent experience in prison makes for great theater, but critics have pointed out that it is yet another example of how Tufts’s narrated account does not match the historical record. Leading up to the spoon episode, Tufts boasts in his narrative about the extensive cache of burglary tools he had amassed, although from that point on, he only reports times when he claims to have been falsely accused of burglary. But Tufts was indeed putting his burglary tools to good use. Throughout this period Tufts was breaking into shops and houses and was accused several times of passing counterfeit coins. In fact, even though Tufts denied ever stealing the spoons in court, he faced multiple counts of thefts and burglaries, and dozens of witnesses showed up to testify against him.

The jury that supposedly deliberated his case for so long in actuality delivered a swift guilty verdict, and the attorney general recommended the death penalty without hesitation. Even though burglary was technically a capital crime in Massachusetts in 1793, it was only reserved for repeat offenders who were clearly beyond reformation. So Tufts was not sentenced to death simply for stealing a set of silver spoons, he was sentenced to execution for continually breaking into shops and houses over the past twenty years.

And finally, Tufts could not possibly have witnessed the preparations for his execution, nor heard the throngs of people who showed up for it, because he received a reprieve from the Governor and the Council a full month before his execution was to take place. He clearly made up this entire episode for dramatic effect.

The Castle in Boston Harbor

After receiving his reprieve, Tufts was committed to the Castle in Boston Harbor, and he describes in detail his new setting:

The castle, so called, is a fortress of some strength and commands the entrance into the harbor’s mouth. About thirty pieces of artillery were then mounted on its battlements, the whole being occupied by a company of soldiers, stationed there, to superintend the works and guard the criminals. At the time of my arrival, fifty or more persons, of that description, were under confinement, and doomed to hard service. They were a motley crew, consisting of different kinds of people, as well black as white, as of divers nations and languages; to wit, some French, English, Dutch, Spanish, Irish and American convicts; the latter, however, were the more numerous order. On further acquaintance, I found them a heterogeneous mixture of as vile miscreants and execrable wretches, as human conception could have framed ideas of; there had been no impropriety in pronouncing them the mere dregs of human nature; the refuse and offscouring of the whole globe.

The convicts were mainly employed in making nails, and at the slightest appearance of idleness or insubordination, the soldiers would “beat them like dogs.” When they weren’t making nails, the convicts engaged in “every species of villainy, which they could possibly perpetrate with impunity, such as cursing, swearing, cheating, lying, quarrelling and stealing from one another.”

Life was hard at the Castle. At the end of the workday, Tufts slept on the prison floor with just a tattered rug or blanket for warmth. The coarse bread and tainted “bullock’s heads” served to him evoked such nausea that it was difficult for him to swallow enough of the food to sustain him. When Tufts broke his arm, no doctor attended him, so he had to let it heal on his own. And the frost and snow on his bare feet in winter caused his skin and nails to drop off.

As the summer of 1794 rolled around, Tufts heard preparations for the Fourth of July, but since prisoners were denied participating in this celebration of American freedom, the holiday only heightened awareness of his confinement. Tufts realized that he had yet to try escaping from the island. By this time, Tufts had earned the trust of one of the officers, who gave him full license to move around the twenty-acre island. Tufts casually wandered to the edge of the isle, covered his head with some tufts of tall grass, and went out into the ocean in an attempt to swim to freedom. Unfortunately, a soldier spotted him from the watch tower, and Tufts’s escape attempt ended in failure when a group of soldiers pulled Tufts out of the water and onto their boat in a state as “sleek as a half drowned rat, and shivering with the cold.”

Tufts’s confinement at the Castle continued until 1798, when a transfer of ownership over the island from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to the U.S. Government necessitated the removal of the convicts. Tufts was put in the Salem jail, and it was not long before he discovered a fault in the wall of his cell and escaped.

Retirement

Tufts returned to his hometown of Lee, NH only to discover that his family had moved to Maine. But Tufts tracked them down and resolved never to steal again, a vow he claims in his narrative to have followed ever since.

While in retirement from his criminal life, Tufts learned that his old associate, James Dennis, with whom he had broken into Mr. Pickard’s shop, had died. Dennis had been picked up for house breaking, and while the sheriff and keepers were escorting him to prison, Dennis attempted an escape. He jumped into a raging river, but the manacles around his wrists prevented him from swimming, and he drowned.

At the end of his narrative, Tufts thanks those who treated him well at the Castle, forgives those who did not treat him well, and expresses hope that those he wronged will forgive him. But he not so convincingly ends his book, “Heaven grant, I may do no more wickedly.”

Sources

  • Tufts, Henry. A Narrative of the Life, Adventures, Travels, and Sufferings of Henry Tufts. Dover, NH: Samuel Bragg, 1807. Database: America’s Historical Newspapers, Readex/Newsbank.
  • Williams, Daniel E. “Doctor, Preacher, Soldier, Thief: A New World of Possibilities in the Rogue Narrative of Henry Tufts.” Early American Literature 19.1 (Spring, 1984): 3-20.

Early American Criminals: Henry Tufts’s Partners in Crime

[display_podcast]

Go to Early American Criminals

Note: This post follows “Henry Tufts’s Thanksgiving.”

Henry Tufts returned to his family in Lee, NH after slipping away from Mr. Pickard, who in good faith had released him from the Old York jail. When Tufts arrived in his home town, though, he discovered that his reputation was as bad as ever, especially when word of his recent exploits reached the gossip circles. To make matters worse, a group of drunken soldiers who were returning from training passed by Tufts’s property and decided to pull his house apart. Tufts threatened the ruffians with a musket, and even though the gun “snapt in the pan” when he took aim at the ringleader, it was enough to scare the group away.

This experience convinced Tufts that he once again needed to leave his family.

Back on the Road

While back on the road Tufts met James Smith, and the two became partners in crime by stealing hens, turkeys, sheep, and other food from farmers for their subsistence. Their carefree lifestyle lasted long enough, until they eventually needed new clothes and other necessities that were not as easy to acquire. A gentleman, who was an acquaintance of Smith, suggested that the two could easily break into a store owned by Smith Gilman and Levi Chapman in Newmarket, NH and even offered them help in doing so. The two partners decided to give it a try.

Using the knowledge they gained from the gentleman, Tufts and Smith forced their way through a window of the store and took clothes, money, pieces of silver, and other goods. They returned to Smith’s friend, gave him some of the booty in compensation for his help, and hit the highway towards Massachusetts, where they proceeded to sell the illicit goods. Unbeknownst to the two burglars, Gilman and Chapman were pursuing them. The two shopkeepers caught Tufts and Smith by surprise and had them arrested. As it happened, the gentleman who aided the burglary and enjoyed some of the spoils from it had turned informant and tipped off Gilman and Chapman about the burglars’ probable route of escape.

Tufts and Smith landed in jail in Exeter. Smith was held in the common prison ward, but Tufts’s reputation earned him solitary confinement in the dungeon with heavy shackles and chains attached to his feet and to a huge iron staple in the floor.

Total Darkness

Tufts remained in total darkness with almost no human interaction while waiting for the Superior Court to meet and hear their case. The effluvia that built up in the chamber, the nipping of vermin, and a lack of adequate food and clothing kept Tufts from sleeping well. After three months of enduring these conditions, Tufts and Smith were finally brought to trial and found guilty. As punishment, they received thirty-five lashes, which were administered by one of the other prisoners. They were also ordered to pay costs and damages for what they stole, and if they could not meet the sum, they were to be sold into servitude to help make up the difference. In addition, they were sentenced to thirty-one more days in prison. This time, though, Tufts was placed in a regular jail cell.

While the two were being held, some friends smuggled a few instruments into the prison, and Tufts used them to drill a hole through the wall. Smith was held in a cell immediately above Tufts, and when he learned of his partner’s plan, he asked Tufts to help him escape as well. Tufts agreed to do so. That night, Tufts called up to Smith and told him that the first thing they needed to do to escape was strip off their clothes, turn them inside out, and throw them out the window. After the two accomplished this act, Tufts crawled out of his cell, gathered up the clothes, and sped away. Tufts figured that Smith’s clothes could come in handy after his escape and left his poor partner to his own devices in a naked state.

The Root Cellar

At one point Tufts traveled to Portsmouth in the hope that he would stumble into some kind of windfall, but not meeting with any success he left the city and headed toward Stratham in the darkness of night. Along the way, he grew hungry and remembered that he knew of a horde of apples and pears stored on a nearby property. He stumbled through the darkness, found the entrance to the root cellar, and broke into it with little effort.

Tufts could not immediately locate the cache of fruit in the pitch black, so he felt around and fell upon a box that gave a hollow sounding noise when he hit it. He continued fumbling about until he hit yet another box, which he came to realize was a great coffin. He had inadvertently broken into a crypt that held a grandmother and her daughter. The shock of his discovery froze him and stood his hair on end, but he eventually recovered and fled the grisly space.

Another Partnership

Tufts formed another criminal partnership with someone he met on the road named Ebenezer Hubbard. The two agreed to split the spoils of their larcenies, but they did not meet with much success. Tufts wanted out of the relationship, but Hubbard convinced him to join a plan to break into a fulling mill and steal a quantity of milled cloth. Suspicion immediately fell on the two rogues, and when they were brought in for questioning about the burglary, Hubbard broke down and confessed everything. Tufts found himself back at the Exeter jail, where he received twenty lashes, was held for twenty days in prison, and even though he was ordered to compensate the victim, he was let go after no one stepped forward to purchase his servitude.

Burglar's Tools

Despite the punishments he received during his stints in the Exeter jail, Tufts decided to throw himself into the burglary profession. He systematically collected a number of burglary tools—including augers, saws, and false keys—and then deposited them in several places, so that he could have easy access to them. Tufts was especially proud of his false keys:

I imagine my keys must have been viewed, as a curiosity, by such as were unused to the sight of such rarities; the construction of them, however, is so simple, as to easily be imitated or made by any smith of common ingenuity; and when judiciously fashioned, are of such extensive application, that one key will fit a great variety of locks. I am positive, that, with this assortment of keys, I could have opened, without violence, almost any lock I ever saw; this I am assured by experience, which is indeed the touchstone of truth.

Tufts also began carrying vitriol, aqua fortis, and other corrosive liquids that could soften or eat through iron.

Even though Tufts provides a detailed account of his preparations for becoming a professional burglar, his narrative from this point forward is filled with claims of false accusations of burglary against him. One of these apparent false accusations eventually landed him on the notorious Castle Island in Boston Harbor.

Note: The story of Henry Tufts concludes with “Henry Tufts in the Castle.”

Sources

  • Tufts, Henry. A Narrative of the Life, Adventures, Travels, and Sufferings of Henry Tufts. Dover, NH: Samuel Bragg, 1807. Database: America’s Historical Newspapers, Readex/Newsbank.