Skip to content

Early American Criminals: Bathsheba Spooner, Accessory to the Murder of Joshua Spooner; and James Buchanan, William Brooks, and Ezra Ross for Said Murder

Go to Early American Criminals

Click image to go to Early American Criminals

As part of the 150th anniversary of the Massachusetts Superior Court, the trial of Bathsheba Spooner will be reenacted on June 4, 2009 at the Worcester Trial Court on 225 Main St. in Worcester, MA. The original trial took place at Worcester’s Old South meetinghouse on April 24, 1778 and lasted all day. It was the first capital trial to be held under the newly formed United States government in Massachusetts, and it passed judgment on what was considered to be one of the most extraordinary crimes to be committed in New England.

The Daughter of a Tory

Bathsheba Spooner was the daughter of Timothy Ruggles, a British Loyalist who lost his large estate when he was driven out of the country to Canada for his Tory sympathies. Bathsheba’s parents had lived unhappily together, so when Ruggles left the country, her mother stayed behind and married another man. The relationship between Bathsheba’s parents was apparently so bad, rumors circulated that her mother once served Ruggles his favorite dog for dinner.

In 1766 at the age of 20, Bathsheba married Joshua Spooner, a retired trader. Their marriage was not a happy one either. Joshua was a feeble man, and Bathsheba was young, attractive, and full of energy. She often entertained visitors at her house in Brookfield, MA, and she particularly seemed to enjoy the company of young men. At one point, she nursed back to health a teenage American soldier, Ezra Ross, and the two likely developed an intimate relationship without the knowledge of Joshua.

The Desperate Housewife

By the winter of 1778, Bathsheba had had enough of her marriage and began to entertain thoughts about how to end it. While her husband and Ezra Ross were away on an extended trip in February, she solicited two former British soldiers from General Burgoyne’s army, who happened to be passing by on their way to Springfield, to join her in her home. Bathsheba served James Buchanan and William Brooks breakfast in her sitting room–a formal move that took the two ex-soldiers by surprise–and then invited them to stay with her on account of bad weather.

After a day or two had passed, Bathsheba confessed to Buchanan that she and her husband did not get along. Later, she told him that she did not expect her husband to return, as Ross had taken with him on the trip an ounce of poison that he promised to give to Joshua. She asked the two soldiers to stay with her to see whether or not her husband would indeed return. Despite these odd conversations, Buchanan and Brooks remained at the house and continued to enjoy her hospitality and the practically unlimited food and drink she offered them. After ten or eleven days, Ross and Bathsheba’s husband returned from their travels. Evidently, Ross never found the chance to slip Joshua the poison.

Joshua was naturally suspicious of the two unexpected guests staying in his house and asked them to leave in the morning. Buchanan and Brooks left the house the next day, but with the support of Bathsheba they continued to stay in the neighborhood. They slept in the barn, drank the liquor she continued to buy for them, and slipped back into the house at her invitation during times when Joshua was away.

The Crime

Through the time of their stay, Bathsheba attempted to involve Buchanan and Brooks in several schemes to murder her husband by offering them $1,000 and some clothing, but the plans never materialized. On Sunday, March 1, however, Buchanan and Brooks came to Bathsheba’s house, where Ross was already waiting with some pistols. Bathsheba told the two that they were going to kill her husband that night, but the two ex-soldiers talked her and Ross out of using the guns, because their sound would attract too much attention from the neighbors.

Bathsheba served the three men supper and some rum while they waited for Joshua to return from a tavern down the road. As soon as Joshua arrived home, Brooks knocked him down and began to beat and strangle him. While this was happening, Ross took out Joshua’s watch and handed it to Buchanan. Once Joshua was dead, the three men carried his body to the well, but before dumping it in head first, Buchanan pulled off Joshua’s shoes. The three then went back into the house, where Bathsheba distributed money and clothing to the group, and they all departed into the night.

Brookfield - Spooner Well Site
Image by bunkosquad via Flickr

The next day, the men started drinking early in the morning in an attempt to erase the memory of what they had done. That night, Brooks showed up intoxicated at Mr. Brown’s tavern wearing silver buckles and exhibiting Joshua’s watch. His display brought immediate suspicion. By this time, news of the murder had spread throughout the area, and the three men involved were quickly apprehended. Newspapers throughout the Northeast carried the story of the murder and filled in details about the case that almost everyone had already heard about.

The Outcome

Buchanan, Brooks, and Ross were all found guilty of murdering Joshua Spooner, and Bathsheba was found guilty of being an accessory to it. All four received a death sentence for their participation. After sentencing, Bathsheba sought a stay of execution by claiming she was pregnant, and a jury of matrons was convened to examine her. They concluded, however, that she was not with child. Bathsheba desperately asked to be examined one more time, although this time her request was refused. She took the news of the rejection in stride, but she asked that her body be examined after her death to prove the truth of her claim.

The four participants in the crime were hanged together on the same gallows on July 2, 1778 in front of an enormous crowd. Later that evening, a group of surgeons gathered to examine Bathsheba’s body, and she was indeed found to be pregnant with a 5 month-old male fetus.

Resources for this article:

  • “Boston, April 30, 1778.” New-England Chronicle, published as The Independent Chronicle and the Universal Advertiser April 30, 1778. Database: America’s Historical Newspapers, Newsbank/Readex.
  • Chandler, Peleg W. American Criminal Trials. Vol. 2. Boston: Timothy H. Carter and Company, 1844. Internet Archive: http://www.archive.org/details/americancriminal02chaniala.
  • The Dying Declaration of James Buchanan, Ezra Ross, and William Brooks, Who Were Executed at Worcester, July 2, 1778 for the Murder of Mr. Joshua Spooner. [Worcester?], [1778?]. Database: Early American Imprints I, Newsbank/Readex.
  • Lawson, John D., ed. American State Trials: A Collection of the Important and Interesting Criminal Trials Which Have Taken Place in the United States from the Beginning of Our Government to the Present Day. Vol. 2. St. Louis: F. H. Thomas Law Book Co., 1914. Google Books: http://books.google.com/books?id=7_EUAAAAYAAJ.
  • Maccarty, Thaddeus. The Guilt of Innocent Blood Put Away: A Sermon Preached at Worcester, July 2, 1778. On the Occasion of the Execution of James Buchanan, William Brooks, Ezra Ross, and Bathshua Spooner, for the Murder of Mr. Joshua Spooner. Worcester, MA: Isaiah Thomas, 1778. Database: Early American Imprints I, Newsbank/Readex.
  • Williams, Daniel E. Pillars of Salt: An Anthology of Early American Criminal Narratives. Madison, WI: Madison House Publishers, 1993.
  • “Worcester, March 5.” The Massachusetts Spy: Or, American Oracle of Liberty March 5, 1778. Database: America’s Historical Newspapers, Newsbank/Readex.

If you enjoyed reading this post, you may want to read Murdered by His Wife:

Don’t forget to visit the Early American Crime Bookshop for more early American crime book suggestions.

Transported Convicts in the New World: Moll Flanders and Moll King

Note: This post is part of a series on Convict Transportation to the American colonies.

While the American press criticized the practice of British convict transportation, Daniel Defoe enthusiastically supported it in his novel The Fortunes and Misfortunes of the Famous Moll Flanders. Moll Flanders is the most well-known character in literature to have been transported to America. In many ways, her story offers the most complete account of the life of a transported convict, even if she is only a fictional character and her experience was far from the norm of most transported felons.

Moll Flanders fits a line of tales involving convict transportation in both fiction and nonfiction. At the height of British convict transportation to America, both the British and America presses often carried accounts of convicts who were sentenced to transportation, but returned to England early to resume their nefarious ways. Several literary accounts of convict transportation also appeared both during and after convict transportation to America ended. Sweeney Todd, the “Demon Barber of Fleet Street,” is perhaps the most famous fictional example from the nineteenth century, when he begins his bloody rampage upon his return to England after being unjustly transported to Australia.

Book cover of The fortunes and misfortunes of ...
Image via Wikipedia

Convicts In Virginia

Moll Flanders first learns about convict transportation during a conversation with her mother-in-law after traveling to Virginia with her husband. To Moll’s surprise, her mother-in-law informs her that the colony is filled with productive citizens who first came to America as convicts: “many a Newgate Bird becomes a great Man, and we have, continued she, several Justices of the Peace, Officers of the Train Bands, and Magistrates of the Towns they live in, that have been burnt in the Hand” (88). Her mother-in-law then goes on to reveal that she herself is a former convict by showing Moll the burn on her hand.

This positive view of convict transportation contrasts with her mother-in-law’s opinion of Newgate Prison:

HERE my Mother-in-Law ran out in a long account of the wicked practices in that dreadful Place, and how it ruin’d more young People than all the Town besides; and Child, says my Mother, perhaps you may know little of it, or it may be have heard nothing about it, but depend upon it, says she, we all know here, that there are more Thieves and Rogues made by that one Prison of Newgate, than by all the Clubs and Societies of Villains in the Nation; ’tis that cursed Place, says my Mother, that half Peoples this Colony (87).

Through these conversations Moll, who was born in Newgate Prison, eventually realizes that her mother-in-law is actually her true mother and that her husband is in reality her brother. The shock of this information sends Moll back to England, where she eventually falls into a life of crime.

Defoe published Moll Flanders in 1722, four years after the passage of the Transportation Act, but the story takes place well before this time. The characterization of Virginia being well-populated with convicts by Moll’s mother, then, is anachronistic to the time period of the novel. A significant convict population did not develop in the Chesapeake until after Britain institutionalized convict transportation in 1718. In other details, however, Defoe was more accurate.

A Source of Inspiration

One of the possible sources of inspiration for Defoe’s Moll Flanders is Moll King, a notorious pickpocket and thief who worked for Jonathan Wild. Just as Moll Flanders protects her identity by telling the reader at the beginning of the book that the name she is using is a pseudonym, Moll King used many aliases throughout her criminal career, among them Mary Godman, Golston, Golstone, Gilstone, Goulston, Gouldstone, Gouldston, Godfrey, Godson, and Bird.

All of these aliases make it difficult to trace the history of Moll King accurately, and most likely they confounded the authorities back then as well. The first time we know for sure that Moll King appeared before the Old Bailey was in 1693. Under the name Mary King, alias Godman, she was found guilty of housebreaking and sentenced to branding. The name “Mary King” appears in the Old Bailey records several times before and after this time, but it is impossible to determine which, if any of them, is actually Moll King.

Moll King was also transported to the American colonies several times under various names. In December 1718, she was indicted under the name of Mary Goulston for stealing a gold watch and chain and was sentenced to death. She turned out to be pregnant, however, and instead was transported on the Susannah & Sarah under the name of Gilstone in 1719, after she had her baby. King quickly turned around and returned to London, but soon after arriving back from transportation Jonathan Wild threatened to expose her as a returned convict if she didn’t join his criminal empire and begin stealing for him.

After about a year of operating under Wild’s thumb, King was caught robbing dress materials from a house on June 14, 1721. During this time, Defoe both wrote and edited newspaper stories about Moll King’s return from transportation and about her criminal exploits, and her story very likely gave Defoe the idea of writing a novel about a female criminal.

For the robbery of the dress materials, King was transported on the Gilbert under the name of Mary Goulstone in 1722. Once again she returned to England, was caught, and was transported by the Alexander under the name of Mary Godson in 1723. Also accompanying her on the voyage was Sarah Wells, aka “Callico Sarah” (See “Convict Voyages (12): Convict Passengers on the Jonathan”). After this, the third time that Moll King was transported, the certainty of her history becomes muddled once again.

A Defense of Convict Transportation

After returning to England and falling into a life of crime, Moll Flanders is caught trying to rob a plate from a goldsmith and finds herself in Newgate Prison, the place of her birth, with a death sentence hanging over her head. Moll, however, successfully appeals her sentence and receives a conditional pardon of transportation for 14 years instead. While in Newgate, Moll meets one of her former husbands, who maintains that he prefers execution to being sold as a slave in America as a transported convict. Moll eventually convinces him to plead guilty in exchange for transportation, and she arranges to have him join her on board the transport ship.

Unlike the other convicts on board her ship, Moll has considerable resources at her disposal to help set herself up for success in America. A governess of Moll’s arranges to load the ship with Moll’s personal belongings, and she supplies Moll with plenty of money. The governess also communicates with the captain to help Moll secure both a private cabin for the voyage and freedom for her and her husband after they arrive in America.

Moll’s early experience in Virginia also gives her great advantages. Before casting off for America, Moll has her governess purchase tools and other items necessary for setting up a plantation, knowing that they will cost twice as much to procure once she arrives at her destination. Upon landing in America, she also learns that her deceased mother has left her a considerable sum of money, as well as a yearly stipend from the family plantation in Virginia. With the help of a Quaker, Moll and her husband set up a prosperous plantation on their own, and they even purchase a female English servant and a black African slave to work on it. Few, if any, transported convicts enjoyed such advantages and treatment.

Moll discovers at the book’s conclusion that by turning her energies to forging a productive life in the colonies she can atone for a previously wicked one. The Preface to the novel maintains:

[Moll’s] application to a sober Life, and industrious management at last in Virginia, with her Transported spouse, is a Story fruitful of Instruction, to all the unfortunate Creatures who are oblig’d to seek their Re-establishment abroad; whether by the Misery of Transportation, or other Disaster; letting them know, that Diligence and Application have their due Encouragement, even in the remotest Parts of the World, and that no Case can be so low, so despicable, or so empty of prospect, but that an unwearied Industry will go a great way to deliver us from it, will in time raise the meanest Creature to appear again in the World, and give him a new Cast for his Life (4).

The entire novel is framed by convict transportation, and the narrative works to argue its benefits. Moll’s experiences in America and her improvement at the end makes Defoe’s novel one of the most spirited and extended defenses of convict transportation ever written.

Resources for this article:

Learn More About Convict Transportation

Learn more about convict transportation to colonial America by reading my book, Bound with an Iron Chain: The Untold Story of How the British Transported 50,000 Convicts to Colonial America.

Amazon.com: Paperback ($16.99) and Kindle ($4.99).

Smashwords: All e-book formats ($4.99).

Most people know that England shipped thousands of convicts to Australia, but few are aware that colonial America was the original destination for Britain’s unwanted criminals. In the 18th century, thousands of British convicts were separated from their families, chained together in the hold of a ship, and carried off to America, sometimes for the theft of a mere handkerchief.

What happened to these convicts once they arrived in America? Did they prosper in an environment of unlimited opportunity, or were they ostracized by the other colonists? Anthony Vaver tells the stories of the petty thieves and professional criminals who were punished by being sent across the ocean to work on plantations. In bringing to life this forgotten chapter in American history, he challenges the way we think about immigration to early America.

The book also includes an appendix with helpful tips for researching individual convicts who were transported to America.

Visit Pickpocket Publishing for more details.

Transported Convicts in the New World: The Reaction of the American Colonies

Note: This post is part of a series on Convict Transportation to the American colonies.

That the British policy of transporting convicts to America was not well received by colonists should come as no surprise to anyone. American colonists complained that Britain was using their land as a dumping ground for their undesirables in the name of helping the colonies with its labor shortage. The colonial legislatures of Maryland and Virginia both tried to pass laws with the intention of blocking the import of convicts into their colonies, and American newspapers carried numerous editorials denouncing the practice.

Attempts to Regulate the Convict Trade

American colonists worried about the sudden appearance of so many unwanted immigrants in their midst. In an attempt to curtail if not put an end to the import of British convicts into their colonies, both Virginia and Maryland passed laws to regulate the convict trade. In 1722, Virginia passed an act that levied fees and put in place layers of bureaucracy so as to make it entirely unprofitable for convict merchants to do business in its colony. Jonathan Forward immediately petitioned the Board of Trade to have the act overturned, and he testified before the Board in person on June 27, 1723.

The Board agreed with Forward’s arguments, concluding that if other colonies adopted similar measures, the practice of convict transportation would become unsustainable and would essentially allow colonial law to take precedence over the Transportation Act. Acting on the recommendation of the Board, the Privy Council struck down the Virginia law on August 27. Maryland tried to pass a similar bill that year as well, but Lord Baltimore vetoed it based on the previous decision of the Privy Council.

In 1725, provincial authorities in Annapolis tried to block Jonathan Forward’s agents from unloading their convict cargo without securing a bond assuring the good behavior of its passengers. The agents, not willing to take on such an expense, were forced to take the prisoners back on board the ship. Once again, Forward complained to the authorities back in London, and once again they ruled that the Annapolis rules violated the terms of the Transportation Act.

Almost every time Virginia and Maryland tried to pass laws that placed limits on convict transportation, the British government overturned them. The only act regulating convict transportation that passed British scrutiny was a Maryland law that quarantined convict ships that arrived with sick felons on board. Virginia tried to pass similar acts in 1767 and 1772, but both failed on grounds that they contained defects in their administration.

Grumblings in American Newspapers

In 1721, the American Weekly Mercury of Philadelphia carried one of the first newspaper stories about American resistance to convict transportation. The article reported that merchants were beginning to refuse to carry convicts to America despite the large sums of money being offered them to do so. The merchants contended that even though the convicts have helped planters who desperately needed their labor, the colonies have been complaining bitterly about how the convicts have generally been corrupting their society.

On April 16, 1722, The Boston News-Letter protested British shipment of convicts to the American colonies in a more direct manner: “Eighty five Felons have been lately ship’d off for our Colonies in America. Tho’ we abound with those Vermin such Numbers of them are order’d for Transportation every Sessions, it is hoped in a little Time the Plantations there will be pretty well stock’d, tho’ it were to be wish’d with honester People.” In general, though, complaints like this one appeared only sporadically in American newspapers during the early years of convict transportation.

As time went on, discussions of convict transportation began to appear in American newspapers more frequently. At one point, the Virginia Gazette and the Maryland Gazette engaged in a sarcastic exchange about the arrival of convicts to their region. In 1752, the Virginia Gazette reported that a ship carrying 150 convicts bound for Maryland had arrived in the James River, adding, “We congratulate the Marylanders on the safe arrival of these recruits!” The Maryland Gazette responded, “Thanks for this Virginia compliment! But the author, it is probable, did not think of the old trite proverb—‘The pot should not call the kettle black.’ It is said that Captain Gracey, who brought these recruits into the Patowmack, sold the chief part of them on the south side of that river.”

A Humble Proposal

By the middle of the eighteenth century the number of newspaper stories about transported convicts committing crimes in America began to spike, and along with them was an increase in the number of editorials complaining about Britain’s policy of shipping convicts to America without recourse.

Portrait of Benjamin Franklin
Image via Wikipedia

On May 9, 1751, Benjamin Franklin wrote one of the more biting critiques of convict transportation in his Pennsylvania Gazette. He begins on the front page with a series of reports about serious crimes committed in Maryland and Virginia. The accounts include a story about a gang of thieves that broke into a Maryland home and then later that same night robbed a store of goods worth 200 pounds. Other stories involve two separate cases of robbery, another roving gang of bandits in Virginia that boldly robbed their victims in daylight, and a forger who came from a reputable Maryland family but supposedly turned to crime under the influence of transported convicts. Franklin also adds a letter from Maryland about how two transported convicts presumably murdered a sea captain and two others.

Franklin follows these criminal accounts with an open letter that begins, “By a Passage in one of your late Papers, I understand that the Government at home will not suffer our mistaken Assemblies to make any Law for preventing or discouraging the Importation of Convicts from Great Britain, for this kind Reason, ‘That such Laws are against the Publick Utility, as they tend to prevent the IMPROVEMENT and WELL PEOPLING of the Colonies.”

Franklin continues, “Such a tender parental Concern in our Mother Country for the Welfare of her Children, calls aloud for the highest Returns of Gratitude and Duty,” and he goes on to suggest a fair exchange for Britain’s convicted felons:

In some of the uninhabited Parts of these Provinces, there are Numbers of these venomous Reptiles we call RATTLE-SNAKES; Felons-convict from the Beginning of the World: These, whenever we meet with them, we put to Death, by Virtue of an old Law, Thou shalt bruise his Head. But as this is a sanguinary Law, and may seem too cruel; and as however mischievous those Creatures are with us, they may possibly change their Natures, if they were to change the Climate; I would humbly propose, that this general Sentence of Death be changed for Transportation.

Franklin ends the letter:

Now all Commerce implies Returns; Justice requires them: There can be no Trade without them. And Rattle Snakes seem the most suitable Returns for the Human Serpents sent to us by our Mother Country. In this, however, as in every other Branch of Trade, she will have the Advantage of us. She will reap equal Benefits without equal Risque of the Inconveniences and Dangers. For the Rattle-Snake gives Warning before he attempts his Mischief; which the Convict does not.

Opinions vs. Reality

Convict merchants and the British government resisted any effort by the American colonies to interfere with the convict trade. There was too much money to be made by the transporters of convicts and there was too much social benefit for Britain to allow the colonies to get in the way of such an expedient means of handling their convicted felons.

Even though objections to convict transportation in the American colonies could be quite vocal, they generally came from those who did not employ convict labor. Many of the complaints about the practice appeared in northern newspapers or were from colonies that generally did not receive any convicts from Britain. Despite these objections, planters who needed cheap labor for their plantations to function continued to buy up convicts almost as fast as they landed.

Resources for this article:

  • Coldham, Peter Wilson. Emigrants in Chains: A Social History of Forced Emigration to the Americas of Felons, Destitute Children, Political and Religious Non-conformists, Vagabonds, Beggars and Other Undesirables, 1607-1776. Baltimore, Md.: Genealogical Pub. Co., 1992.
  • Grubb, Farley. “The Market Evaluation of Criminality: Evidence from the Auction of British Convict Labor in America, 1767-1775.” The American Economic Review 91.1 (2001): 295-304.
  • “London, Feb. 10.” The Boston News-Letter From Monday, April 16 to Monday, April 23, 1722: 4. Database: America’s Historical Newspapers, NewsBank/Readex.
  • “London, May 20.” The American Weekly Mercury From Thursday, August 31st to Thursday, September 7th, 1721: 3. Database: America’s Historical Newspapers, NewsBank/Readex.
  • Middleton, Arthur Pierce. Tobacco Coast: A Maritime History of Chesapeake Bay in the Colonial Era. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1953.
  • “Philadelphia, May 9.” The Pennsylvania Gazette May 9, 1751: 1-2. Database: America’s Historical Newspapers, NewsBank/Readex.
  • Scharf, J. Thomas. History of Maryland: From the Earliest Period to the Present Day. 3 vols. Baltimore: John B. Piet, 1879, Vol. I: 371-372.
  • Smith, Abbot Emerson. Colonists in Bondage : White Servitude and Convict Labor in America, 1607-1776. The Norton Library; N592. New York: Norton, 1971.
  • Sollers, Basil. “Transported Convict Laborers in Maryland During the Colonial Period.” Maryland Historical Magazine March 1907: 17-47.

Learn More About Convict Transportation

Learn more about convict transportation to colonial America by reading my book, Bound with an Iron Chain: The Untold Story of How the British Transported 50,000 Convicts to Colonial America.

Amazon.com: Paperback ($16.99) and Kindle ($4.99).

Smashwords: All e-book formats ($4.99).

Most people know that England shipped thousands of convicts to Australia, but few are aware that colonial America was the original destination for Britain’s unwanted criminals. In the 18th century, thousands of British convicts were separated from their families, chained together in the hold of a ship, and carried off to America, sometimes for the theft of a mere handkerchief.

What happened to these convicts once they arrived in America? Did they prosper in an environment of unlimited opportunity, or were they ostracized by the other colonists? Anthony Vaver tells the stories of the petty thieves and professional criminals who were punished by being sent across the ocean to work on plantations. In bringing to life this forgotten chapter in American history, he challenges the way we think about immigration to early America.

The book also includes an appendix with helpful tips for researching individual convicts who were transported to America.

Visit Pickpocket Publishing for more details.

Transported Convicts in the New World: The Buyers of Convicts

Note: This post is part of a series on Convict Transportation to the American colonies.

Convicts from Great Britain made up the largest number of forced immigrants from Europe to America in the eighteenth century, with kidnapping victims and forced political exiles trailing far behind. One of the ideas behind the creation of convict transportation was that while serving out their terms of punishment convicted felons could gain valuable experience and skills that they could then use to make something of themselves in America.

The truth is that convicts who served out their terms had a much more difficult time settling in America than those who came before them. The buyers of transported convicts were in a much better position to take advantage of the opportunities that the land afforded them, and even then they faced considerable challenges.

The Rise of Plantations

Most of the planters in Maryland and Virginia who purchased convict labor had roots in America going back to the mid-seventeenth century, well before convict transportation was institutionalized. They generally were the descendants of sons of middling English merchants who came to America in search of economic opportunity. These early settlers were rough and eager to get rich, but it wasn’t easy for them to establish themselves in America. Disease claimed the lives of many of them. Tobacco, their chief crop, offered them only moderate returns, and cultivating it required a lot of work. They lived in modest houses, because they didn’t have the time or money to spend developing their estates beyond the support of basic agriculture.

By the eighteenth century, however, the rich were getting richer and the poor were getting poorer. Because tobacco is such a labor-intensive crop, the income of planters was proportional to the number and efficiency of their laborers, not to the amount of land that they owned. Land was cheap in colonial America; labor was not. Wealthy planters were able to purchase slaves–a labor commodity that smaller planters were generally unable to afford–which allowed them to produce more tobacco. With the greater profits that came with growing more tobacco came the ability to purchase more slaves.

By the 1720’s, about the time when convicts began to be shipped to the colonies, some planters were rich enough to begin building the stately mansions that are associated with southern plantations today. Through the use of slaves, indentured servants, and convicts, the great planters were able to grow their business more quickly and came to dominate the area both economically and politically, although smaller tobacco planters continued to operate as well.

Plantation Owners

The great plantations functioned as self-contained communities run by a patriarch who had a strong sense of independence and was distrustful of outside help. His large house, the vast acreage of his plantation, and the number of workers who supported his enterprise all worked toward creating a self-sufficient enterprise.

John Mason, the son of George Mason, describes the self-contained world of the 18th-century plantation:

It was very much the practice with gentlemen of landed and slave estates in the interior of Virginia, so to organize them as to have considerable resources within themselves . . . Thus my father had among his slaves carpenters, coopers, sawyers, blacksmiths, tanners, curriers, shoemakers, spinners, weavers and knitters, and even a distiller. His woods furnished timber and planks for the carpenters and coopers, and charcoal for the blacksmith; his cattle killed for his own consumption and for sale supplied skins for the tanners, curriers, and shoemakers, and his sheep gave wool and his fields produced cotton and flax for the weavers and spinners, and his orchards fruit for the distiller (qtd. in Breen, Tobacco Culture).

Plantation owners were perceived to be arrogant, domineering, and greatly concerned with their social standing. One English traveler described planters as “immensely rich, and I think one of them, at this Time, numbers upon his Lands near 1,000 Wretches, that tremble with submissive Awe at his Nod, besides white Servants.” Another traveler noted their “litigious spirit” and was astounded by how many cases were brought before the courts at each session. Other contemporaries, however, described planters as being rather benign.

John Adams, in his diary entry for February 23, 1777, brought a Boston bias to his harsh assessment of the people of Maryland:

The Manners of Maryland are somewhat peculiar. They have but few Merchants. They are chiefly Planters and Farmers. The Planters are those who raise Tobacco and the Farmers such as raise Wheat &c. The Lands are cultivated, and all Sorts of Trades are exercised by Negroes, or by transported Convicts, which has occasioned the Planters and Farmers to assume the Title of Gentlemen, and they hold their Negroes and Convicts, that is all labouring People and Tradesmen, in such Contempt, that they think themselves a distinct order of Beings. Hence they never will suffer their Sons to labour or learn any Trade, but they bring them up in Idleness or what is worse in Horse Racing, Cock fighting, and Card Playing.

Smaller tobacco planters who could not afford to buy slaves would often turn to convicts or indentured servants to help work their fields, since they cost much less than slaves. Larger planters would purchase convicts to supplement their slave holdings, basically relying on the English-born servants to perform specialized functions that they brought with them from England.

The Carroll Family and Chesapeake Ironworks

The Carroll family from Maryland was one of the many employers of convict labor. Charles Carroll the Settler came from Ireland to Maryland in 1688 seeking an environment where his Roman Catholicism would not impede his political and economic advancement. The Glorious Revolution in England, however, jeopardized his plan, yet he still managed to accrue a fortune through land, slaves, moneylending, and mercantilism.

Charles Carroll of Carrollton
Image via Wikipedia

Carroll’s eldest son, Charles Carroll of Annapolis, continued to build the family empire and became one of the richest men in Maryland. His grandson, Charles Carroll of Carrollton, was the only Catholic signer of the Declaration of Independence. The latter two Carrolls purchased convicts both to work on their plantations and in their ironworks company.

Along with tobacco, iron was another popular commodity produced in the Chesapeake area in the eighteenth century. English capitalists, iron-masters, and merchants formed the Principio Company in Maryland by establishing an iron forge in 1715 and the Principio Furnace in 1724. At its peak, the Principio Company produced half the iron exported by Maryland.

The Accokeek Furnace was founded in 1725 in the Northern Neck of Virginia and was soon followed by many others, including the Baltimore Iron Works, which became the second largest iron enterprise in Maryland after the Principio Company. The Carroll family owned a fifth interest in the Baltimore Iron Works and made 400 pounds sterling from it a year.

Convicts were regularly purchased to work in the iron factories and mines. This form of employment was considered to be the worst and most laborious that a convict could land after arriving in America. Not surprisingly, advertisements for runaway convict servants placed by iron companies regularly appeared in local newspapers.

Resources for this article:

Learn More About Convict Transportation

Learn more about convict transportation to colonial America by reading my book, Bound with an Iron Chain: The Untold Story of How the British Transported 50,000 Convicts to Colonial America.

Amazon.com: Paperback ($16.99) and Kindle ($4.99).

Smashwords: All e-book formats ($4.99).

Most people know that England shipped thousands of convicts to Australia, but few are aware that colonial America was the original destination for Britain’s unwanted criminals. In the 18th century, thousands of British convicts were separated from their families, chained together in the hold of a ship, and carried off to America, sometimes for the theft of a mere handkerchief.

What happened to these convicts once they arrived in America? Did they prosper in an environment of unlimited opportunity, or were they ostracized by the other colonists? Anthony Vaver tells the stories of the petty thieves and professional criminals who were punished by being sent across the ocean to work on plantations. In bringing to life this forgotten chapter in American history, he challenges the way we think about immigration to early America.

The book also includes an appendix with helpful tips for researching individual convicts who were transported to America.

Visit Pickpocket Publishing for more details.

Transported Convicts in the New World: At Auction

Note: This post is part of a series on Convict Transportation to the American colonies.

Once transported convicts arrived in America and were prepared for sale, prospective buyers were invited on board to enjoy some rum punch and inspect them.

The Sale

Potential buyers examined the convicts in the same way as they did slaves: feeling their muscles, looking into their mouths to evaluate the condition of their teeth, and asking them questions to determine their morals and potential obedience.

In one of the few surviving accounts of the experience of a transported convict, William Green compares his sale to a livestock auction:

. . . we were put all on shore in couples, chained together and drove in lots like oxen or sheep, till we came to a town called Fike, where was a great number of men and women, young and old, came to see us; they search us there as the dealers in horses do those animals in this country, by looking at our teeth, viewing our limbs to see if they are sound and fit for their labour, and if they approve of us after asking our trades and names, and what crimes we have been guilty of to bring us to that shame, the bargain is made.

Buyers had to be careful, because sometimes prisoners claimed they had skills in handicrafts for which they had little or no experience in the hope of procuring a more desirable position. Sellers of convicts might also try to hide the true origins of their cargo and pass them off as regular indentured servants. In order to prevent such deception, Maryland passed an act requiring that copies of felons’ convictions had to be presented upon the arrival of a convict ship, with a fine of ₤10 for failure to do so.

The Sale of James Revel

James Revel was sentenced to transportation for 14 years in Surrey in 1771 and traveled to Virginia on board the Thornton. He provides a more complete description of his sale than William Green, albeit in doggerel verse:

The women from us separated stood,
As well as we by them to be thus view’d,
And in short time some men up to us came,
Some ask’d our trade, others ask’d our name.

Some view’d our limbs turning us around,
Examining like horses, if we were sound,
What trade my lad, said one to me,
A tin man, sir. That will not do for me.

Some felt our hands, others our legs and feet,
And made us walk to see if we were compleat,
Some view’d our teeth to see if they were good,
And fit to chew our hard and homely food,

If any like our limbs, our looks and trade,
Our captain then a good advantage made,
For they a difference make it doth appear,
‘Twixt those of seven and those of fourteen years.

Another difference too there is allow’d,
Those who have money will have favour shew’d,
But if no cloaths nor money they have got,
Hard is their fate, and hard will be their lot.

At length a grim old man unto me came,
He ask’d my trade, likewise my name
I told him I a tin-man was by trade,
And not eighteen years of age I said.

Likewise the cause I told which brought me here,
And for fourteen years transported were;
And when from me he this did understand,
He bought me of the captain out of hand.

The Exchange of Convicts and Tobacco

Captains were eager to sell off their cargo, both to relieve them of the responsibility for the welfare and feeding of the convicts and to make sure that the sale did not interfere with their plans for the trip back to England. Convicts could be purchased for cash, bills of exchange, credit, or produce, such as tobacco.

The convict trade and the tobacco trade worked particularly well together. Ships from Great Britain brought over cheap labor in the form of transported convicts to work in the tobacco fields; then, the ships filled the empty space created from the sale of the convicts with tobacco to take back to London, Bristol, or another British port for auction.

Once the convicts left the ship, they ceased to be of any concern to the British government. Unlike in Australia, they were not officially watched over or disciplined by any government authority, which is why it cannot be said that convicts transported to America were sentenced to, or served in, a penal colony.

Special Note: To read more about the sale of transported convicts in America, see my previous post, “The Business of Convict Transportation (8): The Sale of Convicts in America.”

Resources for this article:

Learn More About Convict Transportation

Learn more about convict transportation to colonial America by reading my book, Bound with an Iron Chain: The Untold Story of How the British Transported 50,000 Convicts to Colonial America.

Amazon.com: Paperback ($16.99) and Kindle ($4.99).

Smashwords: All e-book formats ($4.99).

Most people know that England shipped thousands of convicts to Australia, but few are aware that colonial America was the original destination for Britain’s unwanted criminals. In the 18th century, thousands of British convicts were separated from their families, chained together in the hold of a ship, and carried off to America, sometimes for the theft of a mere handkerchief.

What happened to these convicts once they arrived in America? Did they prosper in an environment of unlimited opportunity, or were they ostracized by the other colonists? Anthony Vaver tells the stories of the petty thieves and professional criminals who were punished by being sent across the ocean to work on plantations. In bringing to life this forgotten chapter in American history, he challenges the way we think about immigration to early America.

The book also includes an appendix with helpful tips for researching individual convicts who were transported to America.

Visit Pickpocket Publishing for more details.